Is RabbitMQ better than ActiveMQ?
RabbitMQ is the best performance wise according to me, but it does not have failover and recovery options. ActiveMQ has the most features, but is slower. Update : HornetQ is also an option you can look into, it is JMS Complaint, a better option than ActiveMQ if you are looking for a JMS based solution.
Is ActiveMQ compatible with RabbitMQ?
Yes, it is possible. The ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ are two broadly deployed message brokers. The main differentiation is ActiveMQ works as an open-source multi-protocol message broker in Java whereas RabbitMQ has written in Erlang. Both ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ are used in wide industrial applications.
Is Kafka better than ActiveMQ?
Kafka is way faster than ActiveMQ. It can handle millions of messages per sec. ActiveMQ supports both message queues and publishes/subscribe messaging systems. On the other hand, Kafka is based on publish/subscribe but does have certain advantages of message-queues.
Why use Kafka over RabbitMQ?
Kafka offers much higher performance than message brokers like RabbitMQ. It uses sequential disk I/O to boost performance, making it a suitable option for implementing queues. It can achieve high throughput (millions of messages per second) with limited resources, a necessity for big data use cases.
Why use Kafka over MQ?
IBM MQ vs Kafka: Performance Factors Throughput: Kafka is recommended for applications that demand high throughput or interaction with a big data stack. On the other hand, IBM MQ is best suited for applications that require a high level of reliability and cannot tolerate message loss.
Why you want RabbitMQ not Kafka?
While Kafka utilizes a straightforward, high performance routing approach ideal for big data use cases, RabbitMQ is ideal for blocking tasks and allows for faster server response time. Both options are suitable depending on your specific use case.
Who owns RabbitMQ?
Originally developed by Rabbit Technologies Ltd. which started as a joint venture between LShift and CohesiveFT in 2007, RabbitMQ was acquired in April 2010 by SpringSource, a division of VMware.
When should I use RabbitMQ?
RabbitMQ is therefore ideal for long-running tasks or blocking tasks, allowing web servers to respond quickly to requests instead of being forced to perform computationally intensive tasks on the spot. RabbitMQ simply stores messages and passes them to consumers when ready.
Can RabbitMQ talk to IBM MQ?
RE: Connecting RabbitMQ and IBM MQ RabbitMQ is offered in the IBM Cloud, and the developers are considering using it as a messaging solution. But these applications also need to exchange messages with pre-existing IBM MQ infrastructure that will not be migrated to the Cloud right away.
Can we replace RabbitMQ with Kafka?
1. The use of a standardized message protocol allows you to replace your RabbitMQ broker with any AMQP based broker. Kafka uses a custom protocol, on top of TCP/IP for communication between applications and the cluster. Kafka can’t simply be removed and replaced, since its the only software implementing this protocol.
Is ActiveMQ synchronous?
The default setting for ActiveMQ is that all persistent messages outside of a transaction are sent to a broker are synchronous.